Communicating Compliance Terms in Plain English…

communicate compliance terms in plain english

If you have ever been new to a particular field of the workforce, such as healthcare compliance, you know all too well that the language used by coworkers can sound foreign, like gibberish, or “alphabet soup.”  As we continue to work in the field though, we too, start speaking the language.  However, while that may be ok for conversing in the compliance department, it still be confusing if we are trying to communicate with, or to educate, other functional areas of the healthcare organization.  Without knowing the terminology, the message we are trying to convey is unlikely to be understood when received.

Alphabet Soup

Take a look at an example of terminology just starting with the letter “A” from the Office of the Inspector General Work Plan (reference below):

  • ADAP AIDS Drug Assistance Program (note this one includes an abbreviation in the definition);
  • AI/AN American Indians and Alaska Natives (I, for one, was unfamiliar with this abbreviation);
  • AIDS acquired immunodeficiency syndrome;
  • ALF assisted living facility;
  • ALJ administrative law judge;
  • AMD age‐related macular degeneration (while I have heard of macular degeneration, I did not know this was a standard abbreviation);
  • AMP average manufacturer price;
  • ASC ambulatory surgical center;
  • ASP average sales price; and
  • AWP average wholesale price.

Say I am talking to another seasoned compliance professional in front of a new employee.  Using the above “A” acronyms only, the conversation may sound something like this,

“Based on the billing audit, I see we are not receiving contracted AWP reimbursement under our AI/AN contract for ALF patients with AMD.”

As you can imagine, a new employee might be confused by the acronyms and terms communicated instead of using common business English.  Sometimes just saying the entire word instead of the abbreviation is a good place to start, so instead of saying AWP say average wholesale price.

Repetitive Communication

In order to improve communication between seasoned compliance professionals and other members of the organization, it is important to use repetitive teaching strategies.  In addition to saying the entire compliance term and the abbreviation, be repetitive and write out the compliance term in addition to the abbreviation in written communications.  That way staff become more familiar with compliance terminology and it becomes a part of their daily vocabulary.

Knowledge in Practice

When it comes to any industry, including healthcare, it is easy to throw around acronyms and jargon that is familiar and efficient.  However, it is important to be aware of who you are talking to, and therefore make sure they clearly understand whatever it is you are communicating.  Translate and reword industry terminology in emails, policies and teaching materials where necessary in order to improve communication and understanding.  Better compliance will ultimately be the result.

PRACTICE TIP:

  1. Regularly evaluate training and orientation materials to ensure industry specific terminology is defined and understandable.
  2. Utilize the youCompli system as a centralized hub for new and existing compliance processes and utilize the included model procedures throughout the various areas of your organization.

RESOURCES:

Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) Compliance Dictionary found at https://www.hcca-info.org/publications/compliance-dictionary

Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of the Inspector General  (OIG), Work Plan Appendix B: Acronyms and Abbreviations found at   https://oig.hhs.gov/publications/workplan/2011/wp09-appx_b_acronyms.pdf

Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM

District Medical Group (DMG), Inc., Chief Risk Officer and Denise Atwood, PLLC

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article or blog are the author’s and do not represent the opinions of DMG.


Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM has over 30 years of healthcare experience in compliance, risk management, quality, and clinical areas. She is also a published author and educator on risk, compliance, medical-legal and ethics issues. She is currently the Chief Risk Officer and Associate General Counsel at a nonprofit, multispecialty provider group in Phoenix, Arizona and Vice President of the company’s self-insurance captive.  


See YouCompli in Action

Easier, faster, more effective compliance is possible

Collaboration Between Compliance and Risk: What is Permissible?

Compliance departments, generally speaking, guide staff and boards of directors to comply with the requirements, laws and regulations that govern the organization’s business. They also monitor for compliance via internal audits.  Risk departments, on the other hand, address ways to mitigate risk to an organization through such activities as the evaluation and purchase of insurance policies.  Given the broad nature of the scope of these two departments within the organization, when is compliance and risk collaboration permissible?

Possible collaborations

  1. Strategic planning: Collaboration here should include not only compliance and risk but the entire organization and the board of directors, if applicable.
  2. Disaster response and business continuity: As with strategic planning, disaster response and business continuity planning should also involve input and collaboration from all departments in the organization.
  3. General security and privacy : Here the compliance/privacy officer, information technology/security officer, and risk management director should all be included in the planning.
  4. Known security threat and/or breach incident: Compliance, information technology (IT), and risk management would all participate in mitigating a security threat or breach incident on the organization. Each would provide input and guidance on their respective areas of knowledge.
  5. Risk assessments, gap analysis and mitigation plans: Again, the development of these plans should include leaders from the entire organization; moreover, compliance and risk would specifically collaborate on the assessment, analysis and mitigation activities.
  6. General policy development: Compliance and risk staff can collaborate and provide feedback and input for all organization policies.
  7. Record and document retention schedule: Here compliance and risk can collaborate with legal counsel to ensure record and document retention policies comply with state and federal laws.
  8. Staff education: This is an area where compliance and risk can collaborate to provide training, whether it is done in person, virtually, by email or via online course.

Collaborations to vet and evaluate permissibility

  1. Security breach: As noted above, compliance, IT, and risk will work together once a security breach has been identified. It is important to ensure compliance addresses HIPAA related information and potential reporting requirements; IT evaluates the technical aspects of the breach; and risk focuses on reporting to the insurance carrier and mitigation strategies in conjunction with compliance and IT. These collaborative activities will usually take place under a breach coach or law firm to protect the confidential nature of the breach.
  2. Shared work areas: Depending on the confidential nature of discussions, say a lawsuit against the organization, it may or may not be appropriate for compliance staff to be privy to such information. So shared work areas should be closely evaluated.
  3. Shared staff: As with shared work areas, if a staff member such as a registered nurse (RN) is shared between the compliance and risk department, both leaders and the RN must remain in the scope of the job role in which they are working at the time.
  4. Reporting to the board: Typically, compliance reports to the organization’s leader (such as a CEO) but also has direct or dotted line reporting to the board of directors. Make sure any collaborations with other departments do not create potential conflicts of interest with reporting up this chain of command.
  5. Committee membership: As with the analysis discussed above, make sure to vet compliance staff member membership on the risk committee and vice versa to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest.

Goal

All organizations should work to develop a culture where permissible collaborations between compliance and risk occur. They should also make certain that staff feel comfortable calling the compliance or risk department with potential concerns while ensuring the staff not crossing any lines when it comes to compliance or risk department confidential matters or conflicts of interest.

PRACTICE TIP:

  1. Evaluate opportunities for the compliance department to collaborate with the risk management team, as noted above.
  2. Access youCompli to find resources which address required document and record retention requirements.

Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM

District Medical Group (DMG), Inc., Chief Risk Officer and Denise Atwood, PLLC

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article or blog are the author’s and do not represent the opinions of DMG.


Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM has over 30 years of healthcare experience in compliance, risk management, quality, and clinical areas. She is also a published author and educator on risk, compliance, medical-legal and ethics issues. She is currently the Chief Risk Officer and Associate General Counsel at a nonprofit, multispecialty provider group in Phoenix, Arizona and Vice President of the company’s self-insurance captive.  


Sign-up to never miss a compliance related article!


Manage your healthcare regulatory change process effectively and efficiently

YouCompli enables the compliance officers to assign ownership and oversight of tasks to different department heads, functional leaders, or specialists. The solution prompts users to accept, reject, or reassign the task by a stated deadline. Manage the rollout and accountability of new requirements with the best workflow in the business.

CAN MORAL REBELS ASSIST WITH ORGANIZATION COMPLIANCE?

I recently heard the term “moral rebel” while listening to an SCCE Compliance Perspectives podcast.  This piqued my curiosity because I wanted to know if a moral rebel was perceived as a positive.  In the podcast, Amherst College Professor Catherine Sanderson explained that a moral rebel feels comfortable standing up to a crowd and will call out bad behavior. Similarly, Scott A McGreal in Psychology Today wrote moral rebels have a strong sense of moral identity and are more likely to act morally under pressure.  Politics aside, I think we could use more moral rebels right now, especially in our compliance departments.  So, how can moral rebels assist our organizations with compliance? Let’s look at a hypothetical case scenario to find out…

Case Scenario – Chaperone policy

Your organization has chaperone policy which requires a chaperone to accompany the provider and patient for any sensitive examinations involving the genitalia, rectum, groin, buttocks or breasts.  The policy states the chaperone may be a nurse or medical assistant.

From a compliance and risk perspective, the policy has been implemented to protect the patient, the provider and the organization from potential allegations of inappropriate touching.  Education should be done with the providers to ensure the policy is followed regardless of patient and provider gender.  The policy is written this way because the anatomical gender may not reflect the gender a patient ascribes to, relates to, or identifies as.

If a sensitive examination needs to be performed, a chaperone must be present during the examination and their name should be documented in the visit note. If, however, after being educated about the need for a chaperone during the sensitive examination the patient declines a chaperone, this should be witnessed by the provider and another staff member and documented in the visit note by the provider including the name of the staff member who witness chaperon declination.

Potential non-compliance with the chaperone policy

Jesse is a medical assistant who works in a pediatric and adolescent clinic.  Jesse observes a provider who identifies as male take a patient who identifies as female into an examination room alone.  Since Jesse prepped the patient’s chart the night before, Jesse knows the patient is here for abdominal cramps and irregular menstrual bleeding.  Moreover, Jesse prepared the exam room to ensure the provider had a speculum and gel available for a vaginal exam.  During the patient’s visit, Jesse is never called into the room.  While accompanying another patient to the lab for a blood draw, Jesse sees the female patient checking out at the front desk. Jesse wonders who chaperoned the patient’s visit because the only other medical assistant is on lunch break.

Ability to stand up / come forward

In the case scenario above, Jesse would be deemed a moral rebel by speaking up and confirming whether the chaperone policy was followed by the provider.  If uncomfortable discussing with the provider directly, Jesse may report concerns to the nurse manager for follow up. In an organization where moral rebels are valued the nurse manager would support a culture where moral rebels are not afraid to come forward if organization policies are not being followed or there was potential harm to a patient or another staff member.  Moreover, the nurse manager and compliance would ensure there was no retaliation against Jesse.

PRACTICE TIP:

  1. Educate staff on policies, such as the chaperone policy, and then monitor compliance with that policy.
  2. Foster an environment for moral rebels – individuals who are driven by morals to do the right thing – to bring potential issues to the attention of leadership or compliance without fear of retaliation.
  3. Utilize youCompli to ensure you are up to date on laws, regulations, and reporting related to required compliance policies, such as a chaperone policy.

Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM
District Medical Group (DMG), Inc., Chief Risk Officer and owner of Denise Atwood, PLLC
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article or blog are the author’s and do not represent the opinions of DMG.


Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM has over 30 years of healthcare experience in compliance, risk management, quality, and clinical areas. She is also a published author and educator on risk, compliance, medical-legal and ethics issues. She is currently the Chief Risk Officer and Associate General Counsel at a nonprofit, multispecialty provider group in Phoenix, Arizona and Vice President of the company’s self-insurance captive.  


See YouCompli in Action

Easier, faster, more effective compliance is possible

Weaknesses in Internal Controls: How to Manage and Mitigate Vulnerabilities

weaknesses internal controls

Revised September 2022

Risk in US Healthcare

It is incredibly difficult to turn off “work brain” after the day is done.  Thoughts and questions keep creeping in during off work time, personal time.   

For example, did I send the new state law privacy requirements to our IT security team to review? Are the staff following and appropriately documenting for telehealth reimbursement?  Or what should be my priorities on Monday morning? These questions all represent potential weaknesses in internal controls.  Let’s explore what can be done to mitigate or decrease any vulnerabilities. 

It is important to have appropriate internal controls supported by open communication between colleagues, and forthright reporting to both compliance and risk departments in an organization. 

Since organizations are still run by humans, there remains the potential that one human sets up a call to discuss a topic (like a regulatory change), and inadvertently forgets to invite all the other humans affected by the change. Having a process in place where an employee discusses a need to meet with his or her supervisor can help ensure you’ve got the right humans at the table.  

Internal controls must also be communicated to the staff so they can adhere to the organization’s expectations and policies. This is where education, early and often, that includes the why behind the internal control, can provide the best results to reducing any vulnerabilities. 

Top Areas of Risk

Top areas of risk to a healthcare organization include weaknesses or vulnerabilities in security, documentation, operations, and staff performance.  Let’s consider the following: 

  • The risk focus for organizational security typically includes areas like information technology (IT) and physical buildings. Cybersecurity data leaks or active shooters are examples of each.  
  • Incomplete, non-existent, or fraudulent medical record documentation is another large risk for health care organizations. 
  • Lack of clear policies, procedures, or protocols (PPPs) present huge risks to the organization as employees may act in a way which is not in compliance with PPPs. 
  • And finally, human error, even if unintentional, can present costly risks to the organization, such as a Stark law violation. Both the strongest and the weakest internal control for health care organizations involves the staff.  Take cybersecurity: many data leaks come from staff clicking on the wrong link or attachment and letting the “bad guys in” to the network. The same is true when an employee lets someone in the building on their badge scan rather than making them badge in themselves.  

Mitigate Risks

Risk mitigation is an organizational strategy to prevent or decrease the impact of mistakes or unanticipated outcomes when they occur.  One strategy is to implement organizational controls, such as PPPs along with checklists and tools, to either prevent or decrease organizational risks. 

  • A primary and effective way to mitigate risks to the organization is to empower the employees with knowledge. Don’t just have employees complete compliance and risk education online.  Go out and meet the staff and answer their questions in real time!  Or encourage them to call or email their questions and provide timely follow up. 
  • Risk and compliance departments should foster a culture of early reporting by staff when there is a mistake or unanticipated outcome or a deviation from the PPPs. When a staff member makes a report, it is important to document the facts while remaining objective and non-judgmental. (Related: Read Brian Kozik’s story of changing the consequence structure to support a safe to speak up culture) 
  • Ensure you have a usable system to track internal control weaknesses to manage and mitigate vulnerabilities. Whether this is a manual process or is done through an IT application, make sure you consistently use the internal controls to evaluate and mitigate risks because they change – frequently. 
  • Review, or if you don’t have them, develop cybersecurity and business continuity plans. These plans should be living documents that are used regularly and revised at least every two years, to ensure compliance and risk topics are current and mitigated.  These plans should not just be a book on the shelf or a file on a computer. The risk focus for these plans should include tools to monitor both IT and the physical building risks. 
  • Commit to being a leader when it comes to promoting an open culture for reporting weaknesses, or breaks, in internal controls so early mitigation strategies can be implemented. 

Proactively setting internal controls helps you and your colleagues address mistakes and errors when they inevitably do happen.  While there is no failsafe way to ensure 100% compliance with internal controls, or that all employees will do the right thing every time, you’ll be better positioned when staff are educated and equipped to comply with regulations and do the right thing.  And in organizations that have an open culture of reporting, both the risk and compliance teams will be aware of the internal control weaknesses so they can implement mitigation strategies early on. 

Strong internal controls are critical to effective regulatory change management. YouCompli can enable your collaboration with compliance champions and free your time to focus on relationships and communications. Take a look at our regulatory change management solution today.  


Jerry Shafran is the founder and CEO of YouCompli. He is a serial entrepreneur who builds on a solid foundation of information technology and network solutions. Jerry launches, manages, and sells software and content solutions that simplify complex work. His innovations enable professionals to focus on their core business priorities.


Never Miss a Compliance Related Article

Get a 15-minute strategic overview of YouCompli

Compliance Training…On-The-Fly

Simplify Compliance Training

One of the biggest potential challenges for any organization is the pace of change within compliance.

Often, these changes create the need to quickly build and deliver regulatory training to large or small groups of staff.

That may sound easy, but it’s not.

  • Creating the content takes a lot of your time
  • Trying to get people together for a compliance “session” is like herding cats
  • Dumping a bunch of generic content into an LMS system is usually counterproductive
  • Keeping track of it all in spreadsheets and emails is challenging

A large health system in California had 10 days to create, deliver, and complete training their pharmacy techs on a new privacy waiver they had received.

They turned to youCompli’s Compliance Portal.

The portal gave them everything they needed to quickly, effectively complete the work.
We’ve attached a one-page case-study if you’re interested in learning more.

Training case study

See YouCompli in Action

Easier, faster, more effective compliance is possible

Improving Your Reputation: How to Help Your Healthcare Organization See the Compliance Department in a Positive Light

When the compliance team visits another department, staff responses are usually the same: we must have done something wrong.

This isn’t the response that you want. The compliance department and staff should be seen as approachable, working in a collaborative fashion to make the organization more successful. If the compliance department only comes in to run audits and give “constructive” feedback, then compliance will quickly become known for negativity and criticism.

Collaboration

It is important to collaborate with other departments and incorporate a holistic organizational approach. This means valuing what other team members have to offer with regards to compliance in the organization. It can be easy for compliance professionals to make black or white statements regarding compliance with a specific regulation or policy. After all, it’s there in writing — in black and white.

But, other teams can sometimes bring to light another perspective. There may be gray areas in the written requirements or overall process and addressing these could benefit the organization without compromising compliance.

Or, compliance professionals could demonstrate openness to evaluating how requirements and regulations are impacting specific operational workflows. For example, when evaluating a compliance process for telehealth visits related to obtaining consent, the operations leader should be given an opportunity to work with compliance in developing the process.

In-Person Education

One approach to improving collaboration with other departments is to conduct in-person education and question and answer (Q&A) sessions. Ask all department leaders if you can have ten (but no more than fifteen) minutes at their next staff meeting to introduce the compliance team and to solicit compliance-related topics and questions. Before the meeting, make sure to get the department leader to provide two to three compliance-related topics that would be of interest to their team. Prepare a short slide presentation to use in the meeting — typically, one slide per topic and one Q&A slide at the end.

During the meeting, make sure to leave at least five minutes for compliance Q&A. Listen to the staff questions and solicit information on challenges or knowledge gaps related to compliance, so follow up can be done with the that department or team.

Follow-Up Education

Follow up should be timely (within three to four weeks) and can be done a few different ways: short videos, posts on the internal intranet or website, email education, or additional in-person follow up education. There are several excellent (and free) applications available online where you can create short, two- to three-minute compliance videos that can then be distributed to staff.

Follow-up education could also be done by email if the topic and question and answer lends itself to an email response. For example, if staff ask a question about HIPAA’s application to texts or emails, it would be fairly easy to find a one-page summary on the application of HIPAA to texts and emails and attach that to an email.

Volunteers

Another way to improve collaboration would be to have compliance staff volunteer to participate in organization committees not directly related to compliance. For example, compliance professionals could join the policy committee or the activities committee. In this way, the compliance team can develop positive relationships with others in the organization, in an open and approachable way.

Practice Tip:

  1. Reach out to at least 3-4 departments before the end of the year to schedule and conduct in-person meet and greets with a focus on compliance education.
  2. Utilize services such as youCompli to stay current on compliance topics and regulations to present during your meet and greet meetings.

Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM
District Medical Group (DMG), Inc., Chief Risk Officer and owner of Denise Atwood, PLLC
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article or blog are the author’s and do not represent the opinions of DMG.


Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM has over 30 years of healthcare experience in compliance, risk management, quality, and clinical areas. She is also a published author and educator on risk, compliance, medical-legal and ethics issues. She is currently the Chief Risk Officer and Associate General Counsel at a nonprofit, multispecialty provider group in Phoenix, Arizona and Vice President of the company’s self-insurance captive.  


See YouCompli in Action

Easier, faster, more effective compliance is possible

The Role of Compliance Professionals During a Pandemic

COVID-19 has had a significant impact on every industry in almost every country. Healthcare is, obviously, one of the most affected sectors, as the number of  ill patients is always rising, and the stock of key medical supplies and equipment is depleting daily.

In these times, it can seem like compliance is not that important. After all, this is a crisis, and lives are being saved and lost. Is compliance with rules and proper procedure really what we should be focusing on?

The answer, of course, is “yes”. In times of crisis, compliance can get lost in the shuffle, but it does not undermine the value or necessity of compliance and compliance professionals both during and after the crisis.  And when the time of crisis subsides, the challenges which remain will require skilled compliance professionals who are able to identify non-compliance and move the organization towards positive change.

To help support you in this time, we’ve put together some important information on the role compliance has to play during a pandemic. Please fill in the form below to download.

Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM
District Medical Group (DMG), Inc., Chief Risk Officer and owner of Denise Atwood, PLLC
Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article or blog are the author’s and do not represent the opinions of DMG.


Denise Atwood, RN, JD, CPHRM has over 30 years of healthcare experience in compliance, risk management, quality, and clinical areas. She is also a published author and educator on risk, compliance, medical-legal and ethics issues. She is currently the Chief Risk Officer and Associate General Counsel at a nonprofit, multispecialty provider group in Phoenix, Arizona and Vice President of the company’s self-insurance captive.  


Privacy vs. Transparency: You’re in the Middle

Since 1996, HIPAA has required hospitals and other providers to strictly maintain the privacy and security of patient and clinical records.

In 2010, the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) required them to digitize those records for greater transparency.

Today, some 96% of hospitals and 78% of doctors’ offices use electronic health records.

As a result, patients can instantly access the notes from their doctor visits, review their prescriptions, see their lab results, and email questions to the doctor(s) they’ve been seeing. And doctors, whether primary care providers or specialists, can have a patient’s personal information and medical history right at their fingertips.

Unfortunately, so can others.

In 2018, a total of 18 million patient records were hacked and phished. In just the first half of 2019, almost twice as many – 32 million – were.

Clearly, there’s a tug of war between privacy and transparency, and hospitals are the rope.

In 2018, the last year for which complete figures are available, hospitals paid out an average of more than $2.5 million in settlements and civil monetary penalties. That year, the HHS Office of Civil Rights conducted a total of 25,520 complaint and compliance review investigations. And even if the vast majority don’t lead to cash penalties, even the mildest OCR action – resolution after intake and review – can still cost you staff hours and money.

That’s one reason it pays to keep on top of all the latest HIPAA and ePHI changes.

Another is on the horizon for this year. Throughout 2019, OCR has been considering HIPAA regulation changes, and at least some of those should become final this year. Some of those could include easing “aspects of HIPAA Rules that are proving unnecessarily burdensome for HIPAA covered entities and provide little benefit to patients and health plan members.”

Others involve making it easier for hospitals and doctors to coordinate, and requiring instead of just allowing hospitals to share ePHI data with other providers.

That’s why alerts to changes practically as they occur, determining how they apply to you, then implementing and documenting compliance with no wasted time or money makes for good self-defense.

In the battle between privacy and transparency, see how we can keep you out of the crossfire.

Who Needs an “Easy” Button? Regulatory Compliance for Teaching Hospitals and Academic Medical Centers

Nobody chooses to pursue a career in healthcare at a teaching hospital or academic medical center (AMC) so they could process regulatory compliance paperwork. Right?! Nevertheless, health systems spend $39 billion on admin duties to comply with no fewer than 600 regulatory requirements. Most of the time they are juggling these requirements (and a whole lot more) without an effective compliance management system. It’s anybody’s guess what is truly being done to comply.

The regulatory landscape continues to change. It’s even more complex for teaching hospitals and AMCs that have specialized facilities such as children’s hospitals and cancer centers. And it’s nearly impossible to know for sure what is being done to comply with the regs when students and researchers are added to the mix. Compliance oversight is already challenging enough when it includes only clinical and hospital staff, business associates and contractors.

Ever-increasing regulation ushers in more documentation requirements. Satisfying the reporting requirements steals time away from patient care and contributes to burnout. Plus, more regs and more people equals a big compliance headache.

These healthcare systems not only have the pressure to comply with regulations, improve care and cut costs as other hospitals do, but they have the critical mandate to educate future medical professionals and dedicate resources to research.

According to the Association of American Medical Colleges, academic medical centers in the United States contribute $562 billion in annual economic impact. But, what’s even more significant is the impact these facilities have on the health of our society. Medicine moves forward in teaching hospitals and academic medical centers. When people are faced with a health crisis and grasping for innovative treatment and cures, they flock to these systems. Oftentimes this is their last shot at a healthy future. Teaching hospitals and academic medical centers are the epicenter of first breakthroughs. They are also the last resort for patients who have tried everything else. As a result, teaching hospitals have more costly cases and often bear the brunt of safety-net and charity care.

Shouldn’t there be an “easy” button for them?

Academic medical centers and teaching hospitals have a great need for an effective compliance management system. These systems save valuable time and money. But they also make it easy to see what is being done by whom to comply with regs. No more ad-hoc spreadsheets. Thoughtfully applied technology can make regulatory oversight a piece of cake.

The more effective the compliance management system, the more time is freed up for medical professionals to do what they are passionate about—provide the best patient care and focus on their mission of treatment, research and education. And who couldn’t use an “easy” button for compliance regulation?

Are you ready to explore a compliance management system that is easy to use and effective? If you’re ready to transform your regulatory compliance process, schedule a call today!